CNBNews

 

Three years ago, on April 27, 2022, CNBNews had the pleasure of speaking with Brian Morrell, Gloucester City's acting administrator and Police Chief, about the city's approach to abandoned vehicles. During our enlightening conversation, he shared important insights about enforcement, explaining that the responsibility lies with the City Housing Office rather than the police department. It's fascinating to note that, although abandoned vehicles aren't technically classified as a crime, the city's ordinance implies otherwise. When we discussed if an amendment was made to the original ordinance, Morrell honestly admitted he wasn't sure, which added an interesting layer to our dialogue.

 

We believe that his responses were quite significant, considering his key roles in the community. As the City Police Chief and acting City Administrator, having clear and accurate information is essential. When he informed us that the Housing Office was responsible for enforcing the abandoned/derelict car ordinance, specifically Chapter 88, we found it to be a notable point. However, when he mentioned that the police department couldn't enforce the same ordinance,we were somewhat surprised and perplexed. 

RELATED:

Derelict Cars Have Remained on Bwy for Three Years; City Notified in 2022

 

Given Morrell's position as the authority on local ordinance enforcement, we decided to pause our investigation at that time. Looking back, we realize that continuing our inquiry might have led to a different outcome, possibly resulting in the removal of those three abandoned vehicles that have unfortunately lingered over the years.

 

In a recent communication dated May 8, 2025, Vanessa Little, the Municipal Clerk, provided clarity regarding Chapter 88, which was enacted in 1965 and has been updated in 1974, 1983, 2003, and 2021. After reviewing those amendments, it's clear that none have stripped the police department of its authority to enforce that ordinance or designated the Housing Office as the primary enforcer.

 

From our perspective, having a dedicated full-time city administrator would greatly benefit the community. This change would allow Morrell to fully embrace his role as the City's Police Chief once again. We firmly believe that it's challenging for anyone to excel in two demanding roles simultaneously. This isn’t a critique of Morrell, but rather a recognition of the significant responsibilities he bears, which could certainly take a toll on his health and well-being now and in the future.

 

We remain hopeful for a positive resolution that benefits both the city and its dedicated leaders!

 

That is our OPINION; what is yours?