NEWS, SPORTS, COMMENTARY, POLITICS for Gloucester City and the Surrounding Areas of South Jersey and Philadelphia

Brooklawn New Jersey History | cnbnews.net
UEZ Helping to Improve Local Commerce

YOUR MONEY: HEALTH BENEFITS FOR GLOUCESTER CITY EMPLOYEES COST $3 MILLION

FIRST Published December 17, 2012

Financial Officer, there are 99 full-time employees receiving health care, one part-time employee (Parry) along with 51 retired city employees. A

 breakdown of the costs for this insurance reveals: 

 

Medical and Dental .........................$2,320,180

Prescription Plan..................................666,241

Medicare Reimbursements........................26,723

Vision Reimbursements............................1,264

 

TOTAL PAYMENTS.........................$3,014,408

 

Less:

 

Employee Deductions.....................($137,800) estimate

COBRA Prescription Payments..........($12,000)  estimate

 

NET COST TO CITY........................$2,864,608

 

PLUS: 

 

Payment to Employees for waiver of Health Care $75,534

 

TOTAL COST to TAXPAYERS: $2,940,142

 

LIST OF EMPLOYEES WHO WAIVE HEALTH BENEFITS

 

Employees opt out health

It is our opinion Gloucester City council members should not receive paid health benefits, a practice that has been going on for decades. Why? Because they are part-time employees. Another reason is the annual cost to taxpayers for this perk which in past years reached as high as $80,000. In fact, one councilman's health benefits cost taxpayers $19,000 annually.

We believe that mayor and council should not receive this perk nor do we believe they should be paid any money for not taking the insurance. For the past six years we have been urging council members to do the right thing. 

Below is an excerpt from a CNBNews article on this topic that was posted on December 11, 2006. At the bottom of this article are links to several other 

 Members who volunteer their time to serve on the Gloucester City School Board are not entitled to health benefits since they too are part-time volunteers. Which is the way it should be.

Incidentally here in Gloucester City some council members who receive their health benefits from there employer are entitled to be reimbursed from the City for not accepting the city's health plan.

The payments to those city council members in some cases have reached as high as $10,000 annually (that was 2006). A nice part-time job especially when our local politicials lead the public to believe they are only receiving an annual salary of $1,000. I propose to the new members of council (The James Gang) to introduce a measure to stop part-time workers/volunteer council members from receiving health benefits. Likewise the measure should do away with reimbursing council members for not accepting the city's health plan.The change in this perk for volunteer service on city council would go a long way in setting the "bar" for future tax cuts that are needed in this city if any changes are going to be made. By setting the example at the top city employees will see it is not going to be the same Good Ole Boys/Girls Club" any longer. See December 2006 article 

For other articles on this topic see links below.

Send your tip to [email protected] 

RELATED CATEGORY FILM

RELATED: CNBNEWS POINT OF VIEW

 related: ClearysNoteBook YouTube Channel 

 CNBNEWS TIPS AND SNIPPETS

Comments